Is GOG trying to deceive its customers?

HaleyRocks

Farmer
It recently RE-introduced, the "Good Old Games support" and a newfound game voting list, like a glorified, reskinned wishlist.

Old fans remember them axing the Good Old acronym a long time ago, as well as re-shifting both priorities and resources, away from "making older games work in modern systems". This was right before becoming big time, entering the stockmarket, letting shareholders have a say etc. Most of the older games, such as Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines or The Suffering; Prison is Hell, were practically abandoned, to the goodwill of third party moders and fan-patch-makers, which didn't work at all times/for all players or simply, robbed you off having a functional vanilla game. Their support department, used to direct you over at aforementioned third party files, for fixing your game. But even post their recent announcement and the re-iteration of the feature, almost nothing changed.

Similarly, there had always been a wishlist, with thousands, even tens of thousands votes. Hot titles much in demand, almost never arrived, despite all the ruckus involved. And even when a game was wanted and its devs reached gog all by themselves (ex Agony, Hatred etc), the Curation Department at the time, used to turn them down, sometimes even more than three times in a row, despite players craving it, wanting to buy. What difference is their new, flashy looking, wishlist like thing, actually going to make? And why it needed a separate spot, where and when there had already existed, a dedicated forum part?

As if morally greying out the definition of DRM-Free wasn't enough before, or the implementation of a client that isn't optional at all, if you wish to enjoy certain parts of your "drm-free" games and everything else which already transpired... What are they thinking, toying with their users like that? Anybody has any clue?
 
Last edited:

Lew Zealand

Helper
Rebranding explains most changes like that for me.

I'll support GOG as long as I can download their offline installers which I can for all the games I play. The only time I use their client is to download those offline installers in a more convenient format than needing to separately download 20+ 4GB installation .parts. I have yet to play a game from them which requires their Galaxy client so that qualifies as 'optional' for me and I am too simple a person to know who is claiming what when it comes to why they're getting this game and not getting that one.

It's clear that some publishers do not want to support DRM-free and thus never show up at GOG (EA, lol) so those wishlisted items will never appear. As for other drama in the background....

Well.......

With 300+ games in my list and the vast majority I haven't played yet (OK yeah some I never should have bought), I don't think I'm missing out on much. Sure, I'm waiting for:

Horizon Forbidden West
Slime Rancher 2 (already have at Steam, tho)
My Time at Sandrock

and probably some others I can't remember but if they never show up then I'll deal and buy somewhere else.
 

HaleyRocks

Farmer
I bought some games just because I wanted to have the soundtrack
Speaking of soundtrack, GOG less often has one. Steam offers soundtracks for games such as Ion Fury or Terraria, while GOG does not.

Long bygone is the era, that gog was famous for extras. Ever since it purged the old Fallout series extras, the selection of game extras has notice-ably declined!
 

Kumbao

Sodbuster
Speaking of soundtrack, GOG less often has one. Steam offers soundtracks for games such as Ion Fury or Terraria, while GOG does not.

Long bygone is the era, that gog was famous for extras. Ever since it purged the old Fallout series extras, the selection of game extras has notice-ably declined!
I havent bought anything there for a while, but that is a shame. Especially the soundteacks for really old games are hard to get (unless you pirate them). GoG was always my prime source.
 
Top