Should they add a tree killer?

Should they!?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • No!

    Votes: 6 75.0%

  • Total voters
    8

Jvke!

Greenhorn
The tree killer is practically a weed killer but can stop trees from growing because it takes forever to get rid of them this would be a helpful tool in the game game!

Thanks for reading!

Should they though?!
 

Yvi

Rancher
I'm not sure. Part of me says no, but maybe if you put it on a sapling and it froze the growth at that stage? Because sometimes the saplings are cute, and I don't want a full tree for aesthetic reasons.

I would say I would very rarely use it in game, because I love all the trees, but sometimes it might be fun.
 

FilthyGorilla

Local Legend
Going around placing an item on each tree would fundementally not be that much faster than just going around to those same trees and chopping them down, and absolutely much slower than just bombing them.

All I can think of as a practical use for such an item would be aesthetically to have smaller trees, but that's rather niche to have an entire item for
 

stardew_luv

Farmer
No, please! Tress already have it too hard, "thanks" to fall and/or winter!
And climate change and human greed for unnecessary mass destruction and subsequent mass construction of every last space of unused land. Not for necessity, just because they want to make billions they will never spend and picture perfect buildings and housing instead of using what’s already there.

Ok irl rant. Needless to say I voted no.
 

LRangerR

Local Legend
And climate change and human greed for unnecessary mass destruction and subsequent mass construction of every last space of unused land. Not for necessity, just because they want to make billions they will never spend and picture perfect buildings and housing instead of using what’s already there.

Ok irl rant. Needless to say I voted no.
I vote for Hobbit holes for the masses. A/C costs would be so much less
 
Top